Public compare route

Foundation
Compare

Compare two foundations across capital scale, governance visibility, open program surface, and recurring year-memory. Snow and Paul Ramsay are the default pair because they show the current best verified case and the first non-Snow replication case side by side.

Default: Snow vs PRFReusable compare surfaceSide-by-side operator view
Choose foundations
Current pair
Bridge pair

This pair crosses a benchmark foundation with a non-benchmark candidate. Use it to see what evidence is already present on the candidate side and what still separates it from the stable review set.

Backlog lane
General backlog

This pair does not collapse neatly into one missing layer, so the full backlog is the right next surface.

At a glance
Annual giving gap
THE PUSH FOR BETTER FOUNDATION LIMITED leads

$500K vs $100K · 5.0x.

Governance visibility
ECSTRA leads

7 roles vs 4.

Recurring year memory
ECSTRA leads

12 rows vs 1.

Verified grant layer
ECSTRA leads

9 verified grants vs 0.

Review stability
Current estimate
One more verification pass

This pair is close. One side is already stable, while the other still needs verified source-backed program memory or verified grant evidence to stop feeling inferred.

Progress to stable review
6/8 signals complete

2 stability signals still missing across the pair.

Recommended next move
THE PUSH FOR BETTER FOUNDATION LIMITED: Build the verified grant layer

Link report-backed grantees or relationship rows so the review is not relying only on program surfaces.

Open next step
Benchmark fit
Benchmark-ready grantmaker

Corporate Foundation with enough evidence depth for stable philanthropic review.

ECSTRA
Stable review

Governance roles: 7

Verified grants: 9

Year memory rows: 12

Verified source-backed rows: 12

Inferred rows: 0

Completion
4/4 stable signals

No major review-stability gaps remain.

What to do next
Maintain the verified layer

This foundation is stable enough for review. The next job is upkeep rather than core backfill.

Benchmark fit
Grantmaker in build

Corporate Foundation with some review structure in place, but still missing part of the verified evidence stack.

THE PUSH FOR BETTER FOUNDATION LIMITED
Developing review

Governance roles: 4

Verified grants: 0

Year memory rows: 1

Verified source-backed rows: 0

Inferred rows: 1

Completion
2/4 stable signals

Missing: verified grant layer, verified source-backed memory.

What to do next
Build the verified grant layer

Link report-backed grantees or relationship rows so the review is not relying only on program surfaces.

Convert inferred rows to verified source-backed rows

Replace the current 1 inferred year-memory rows with official source-backed program memory.

low confidence

ECSTRA FOUNDATION LIMITED

Corporate FoundationABN 16625525162
Open route
Annual giving
$100K
Open programs
8
Governance
7
Year memory
12
Readiness signals
7 governance roles9 verified grants12 year-memory rows8 open programs
Ecstra Foundation takes a systems approach to grant-making, focusing on partnerships, programs, and people to build financial capability and wellbeing. They evaluate and share outcomes and insights to drive effective financial education. The foundation supports consumer organizations, community legal services, financial counselling bodies, sector peaks, and front-line service providers to address structural barriers to financial inclusion. [17, 18] They also work directly in communities, schools, and other learning environments to design, deliver, and measure financial education initiatives. Ecstra advocates for the crucial role of financial wellbeing in overall health to influence policy and drive systemic change. [18] They prioritize accessible and inclusive programs, often focusing on those in lower socio-economic areas and regional/rural locations. [4, 19]
educationcommunityAU-National
Latest program year memory
2025-26

$20 Boss (Ecstra Foundation Partnership)

program

A structured classroom-based program, supported by Ecstra's multi-year partnership with Young Change Agents, that equips young people with critical financial skills by guiding them through the creation of micro.

Partners: Young Change Agents

Places: Australia

Source: official ecstra program page verified

Evidence: open source

2025-26

Building Community Financial Capability

grant

This grant round empowered communities to create and scale initiatives which address issues of financial capability, inclusion and economic equality at a local level.

Places: Australia

Source: official ecstra program page verified

Evidence: open source

2025-26

Consumer Care Financial Services

grant

Supports organizations working to improve consumer outcomes and assist individuals in financial need. [5, 19]

Places: Australia

Source: official ecstra program page verified

Evidence: open source

2025-26

Financial Wellbeing Program (Ecstra Foundation Partnership)

program

A bespoke program funded by Ecstra that helps social enterprises embed financial education into their support models, aiming to help people gain confidence and skills to control their finances.

Places: Australia

Source: official ecstra program page verified

Evidence: open source

low confidence

THE PUSH FOR BETTER FOUNDATION LIMITED

Corporate FoundationABN 49645093349
Open route
Annual giving
$500K
Open programs
0
Governance
4
Year memory
1
Readiness signals
4 governance roles1 year-memory rows
The foundation focuses on mental health promotion through education, connection, and physical wellbeing rather than direct grantmaking. It operates on a model of engaging everyday Australians in fitness challenges to raise awareness of mental health issues, improve mental health literacy through science-backed content, and support partner charities. Funds raised are used to operate the challenge, support charity partners, equip student ambassadors, and develop new mental health promotion initiatives.
healthindigenousAU-National
Latest program year memory
2025-26

PhD Scholarship (Mental Health and Connection)

grant

A three-year PhD scholarship supported by The Push For Better Foundation at The University of Melbourne, focusing on research into social connection and mental health. Applicants were encouraged to identify specific.

Places: Western Australia, Australia

Source: current program surface inferred

How to use this
1. Compare the capital posture

Start with annual giving, open programs, and governance visibility before you look at stories or relationships.

2. Check year-memory depth

If recurring program rows exist, the foundation is ready for stronger portfolio tracking and annual review loops.

3. Open the detailed route

Use the detailed demo page only after the compare view has made the differences legible.