Foundation
Compare
Compare two foundations across capital scale, governance visibility, open program surface, and recurring year-memory. Snow and Paul Ramsay are the default pair because they show the current best verified case and the first non-Snow replication case side by side.
This pair crosses a benchmark foundation with a non-benchmark candidate. Use it to see what evidence is already present on the candidate side and what still separates it from the stable review set.
This pair does not collapse neatly into one missing layer, so the full backlog is the right next surface.
Both foundations currently surface $500K in annual giving.
10 roles vs 9.
6 rows vs 2.
1716 verified grants vs 7.
Both sides have governance visibility, recurring year memory, and at least some verified source-backed evidence. This is good enough for serious review.
No major stability gaps remain for this pair.
This pair is stable enough for review. Use the detailed route to audit the current evidence layer and keep it maintained.
Open next stepCorporate Foundation with enough evidence depth for stable philanthropic review.
Governance roles: 10
Verified grants: 1716
Year memory rows: 2
Verified source-backed rows: 2
Inferred rows: 0
No major review-stability gaps remain.
This foundation is stable enough for review. The next job is upkeep rather than core backfill.
Corporate Foundation with enough evidence depth for stable philanthropic review.
Governance roles: 9
Verified grants: 7
Year memory rows: 6
Verified source-backed rows: 6
Inferred rows: 0
No major review-stability gaps remain.
This foundation is stable enough for review. The next job is upkeep rather than core backfill.
THE TRUSTEE FOR THE IAN POTTER FOUNDATION
Round 1, 2026 - Environment (EOI)
Expressions of Interest for the Environment program area are open for Round 1, 2026.
Round 1, 2026 - Medical Research (Applications)
Applications for the Medical Research program area are open for Round 1, 2026. Grants will be announced late June 2026.
Good Things Foundation Limited
Capacity Building Grant
Funding to run train-the-trainer programs for staff or volunteer digital mentors, two rounds per year
Places: Northern Territory, Queensland, New South Wales, South Australia, Western Australia, ACT, Victoria, Tasmania, Australia
Source: official program url verified
Evidence: open source
Digital Sisters
Program supporting migrant and refugee women with digital skills
Places: Northern Territory, Queensland, New South Wales, South Australia, Western Australia, ACT, Victoria, Tasmania, Australia
Source: official program url verified
Evidence: open source
Get Online Week Event Grant
Grants for community organisations to host events during Get Online Week, a national campaign promoting digital inclusion
Places: Northern Territory, Queensland, New South Wales, South Australia, Western Australia, ACT, Victoria, Tasmania, Australia
Source: official program url verified
Evidence: open source
Building Digital Skills Grant
Funding for community organisations to run digital skills programs for over 50s, ranging from $3,000 to $20,500
Places: Northern Territory, Queensland, New South Wales, South Australia, Western Australia, ACT, Victoria, Tasmania, Australia
Source: official program url verified
Evidence: open source
Start with annual giving, open programs, and governance visibility before you look at stories or relationships.
If recurring program rows exist, the foundation is ready for stronger portfolio tracking and annual review loops.
Use the detailed demo page only after the compare view has made the differences legible.