Public compare route

Foundation
Compare

Compare two foundations across capital scale, governance visibility, open program surface, and recurring year-memory. Snow and Paul Ramsay are the default pair because they show the current best verified case and the first non-Snow replication case side by side.

Default: Snow vs PRFReusable compare surfaceSide-by-side operator view
Choose foundations
Current pair
Bridge pair

This pair crosses a benchmark foundation with a non-benchmark candidate. Use it to see what evidence is already present on the candidate side and what still separates it from the stable review set.

Backlog lane
General backlog

This pair does not collapse neatly into one missing layer, so the full backlog is the right next surface.

At a glance
Annual giving gap
Macquarie Group Foundation leads

$37.5M vs $500K · 75.0x.

Governance visibility
Macquarie Group Foundation leads

16 roles vs 9.

Recurring year memory
Snow leads

5 rows vs 2.

Verified grant layer
Snow leads

44 verified grants vs 8.

Review stability
Current estimate
Ready for stable review now

Both sides have governance visibility, recurring year memory, and at least some verified source-backed evidence. This is good enough for serious review.

Progress to stable review
8/8 signals complete

No major stability gaps remain for this pair.

Recommended next move
Review the strongest verified route

This pair is stable enough for review. Use the detailed route to audit the current evidence layer and keep it maintained.

Open next step
Benchmark fit
Benchmark-ready grantmaker

Corporate Foundation with enough evidence depth for stable philanthropic review.

Macquarie Group Foundation
Stable review

Governance roles: 16

Verified grants: 8

Year memory rows: 2

Verified source-backed rows: 2

Inferred rows: 0

Completion
4/4 stable signals

No major review-stability gaps remain.

What to do next
Maintain the verified layer

This foundation is stable enough for review. The next job is upkeep rather than core backfill.

Benchmark fit
Benchmark-ready grantmaker

Corporate Foundation with enough evidence depth for stable philanthropic review.

Snow
Stable review

Governance roles: 9

Verified grants: 44

Year memory rows: 5

Verified source-backed rows: 5

Inferred rows: 0

Completion
4/4 stable signals

No major review-stability gaps remain.

What to do next
Maintain the verified layer

This foundation is stable enough for review. The next job is upkeep rather than core backfill.

high confidence

Macquarie Group Foundation

Corporate FoundationABN
Open route
Annual giving
$37.5M
Open programs
4
Governance
16
Year memory
2
Readiness signals
16 governance roles8 verified grants2 year-memory rows4 open programs

The Macquarie Group Foundation drives the social impact work for Macquarie Group, a global financial services organisation. Its core mission is to empower people to build a better future by leveraging both financial and non-financial resources. The Foundation primarily focuses on breaking down systemic barriers to employment globally.

The Foundation operates with an employee-led approach, encouraging its people to contribute service, financial support, and leadership to community organisations they choose. It provides funding through donation matching, grants for employees on non-profit boards, anniversary donations, and financial awards recognising staff contributions. A significant portion of its funding focuses on breaking down barriers to employment and building effective pathways. The Foundation also engages in social impact investing and supports 'shared value' initiatives within Macquarie businesses to solve social issues.
communityyouthemploymentartsInternationalAU-National
Latest program year memory
2025-26

Global Grantmaking

grant

Focus on breaking down barriers to employment and building pathways to work

Places: Australia

Source: official program url verified

Evidence: open source

2025-26

Opportunity Fund

grant

Special grant program responding to areas of greatest social need, including racial equity

Places: Australia

Source: official program url verified

Evidence: open source

low confidence

The Trustee For The Snow Foundation

Corporate FoundationABN 49411415493
Open route
Annual giving
$500K
Open programs
13
Governance
9
Year memory
5
Readiness signals
9 governance roles44 verified grants5 year-memory rows13 open programs
The Foundation approaches giving through a strategy captured in four pillars: Our Place, Our Country, Our Sector, and Our Family. They are committed to advocacy, collaboration, and community leadership, working flexibly and responsively with partners to tackle issues from new angles and foster more caring and inclusive communities.
healthcommunityindigenousAU-ACTAU-NSW
Latest program year memory
2023-24

Deadly Hearts Trek

program

Recurring Snow Foundation portfolio strand for rheumatic heart disease screening and related First Nations heart health work.

Places: Northern Territory

Source: empathy-ledger-program-snapshots

Evidence: open source

2023-24

RHD Strategy

strategy

Recurring Snow Foundation strategy strand focused on rheumatic heart disease systems change and First Nations-led partnership work.

Partners: National Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation

Places: Australia, Northern Territory

Source: empathy-ledger-program-snapshots

Evidence: open source

2023-24

Snow Entrepreneurs

fellowship

Recurring Snow Foundation social entrepreneur support strand.

Places: Australia

Source: empathy-ledger-program-snapshots

Evidence: open source

2023-24

Snow Scholarships

scholarship

Recurring Snow Foundation scholarship and education access strand.

Partners: University of Canberra

Places: ACT, NSW

Source: empathy-ledger-program-snapshots

Evidence: open source

How to use this
1. Compare the capital posture

Start with annual giving, open programs, and governance visibility before you look at stories or relationships.

2. Check year-memory depth

If recurring program rows exist, the foundation is ready for stronger portfolio tracking and annual review loops.

3. Open the detailed route

Use the detailed demo page only after the compare view has made the differences legible.