Useful context, but not the main decision surface. Align it by checking the source date, the main figures, whether it still supports the CivicGraph / ACT operating map, and what action it should send people to next.
NDIS Market Power and Service Coverage
The NDIS is one of the largest social service markets in the country, but most people still cannot see where provider supply is thin, where top providers dominate payments, and where disability-focused social enterprises or community organisations are barely visible in the money flow.
Official Register
Who is formally registered
This is the NDIS Commission provider register, not just the aggregate payment-market data.
Approved providers
0
currently visible in the official register
Graph matched by ABN
—
0 of 0 approved providers already link to CivicGraph entities
Revoked
0
Banned
0
Registered Supply
Where approved providers are concentrated
| State | Approved providers |
|---|
The register shows formal market presence. The payment-market layer above shows where those markets are still brittle or captured. The gap between the two is where surface-level “provider availability” hides real power concentration.
Power Read
Where service markets are easiest to capture
This view combines thin provider supply with Core support concentration. High squeeze scores mean relatively few providers and a very large payment share captured by the top 10 operators.
| District | State | Providers | Top 10 Share | Spend Band | Squeeze |
|---|
What This Means
- Barkly, East Arnhem, Katherine, Goldfields-Esperance, and Far West NSW are all markets where supply is thin and the top 10 providers take an outsized share of payments.
- This is exactly the kind of hidden power pattern that does not show up in ordinary service directories or philanthropy databases.
- For disability, youth justice, and community investment work, the point is not just to find providers. It is to see where markets are brittle, captured, or missing community-owned alternatives.
Queensland Read
Queensland has major metro supply in Brisbane, Ipswich, and Beenleigh, but regional districts like Mackay, Bundaberg, Maryborough, Cairns, and Rockhampton have far thinner provider bases and materially higher Core concentration.
National Supply
Where the providers are
| State | Providers |
|---|
Thin Coverage
Where supply drops away first
| District | State | Providers |
|---|
Cross-System Next Move
This is not just an NDIS report
The point of adding this layer is to connect disability market power to the rest of CivicGraph: justice funding, philanthropy, community-controlled organisations, social enterprises, and place-based disadvantage. Once those layers are ranked together, users can search for where service markets are thin, who is dominating them, and which community-rooted organisations could be backed instead.
Funding move
Find who could fill the gap
Jump into the funding workspace and line up disability funders, charities, and social enterprises against thin markets.
Systems comparison
Compare disability and justice
Use the youth justice layer to see where high social need and thin disability markets overlap.
Delivery scan
Search disability-capable delivery
Pressure-test whether community-rooted or social-enterprise providers exist before accepting incumbent dominance as normal.