Needs review before quoting

Needs source-date, figure, and framing review before quoting externally. Align it by checking the source date, the main figures, whether it still supports the CivicGraph / ACT operating map, and what action it should send people to next.

← All Reports
Cross-System Investigation

Cross-System Power Concentration

0 Australian entities scored across 7 public datasets: procurement, justice funding, political donations, charity registry, foundations, evidence programs, and tax transparency. 0 appear in 3+ systems. 0 entities operate through multiple influence channels simultaneously.

Data updated 8 May 2026
Entities Scored
0
across 7 datasets
Dollar Flow
$0B
procurement + justice + donations
Revolving Door
0
2+ influence channels
Funding Deserts
0
of 0 LGAs scored >50

Source: AusTender × Justice Funding × AEC Donations × ACNC Registry × Foundations × ALMA Evidence × ATO Tax Transparency. All cross-referenced by ABN.

Highest Cross-System Power

Entities appearing in the most government datasets simultaneously. Power score weights procurement and political donations highest, with bonus points for network breadth (distinct government buyers, parties funded).

#EntitySystemsDollar Flow
Get the full PDF

The Revolving Door

0 entities operate through 2+ influence channels: lobbying, political donations, government contracts, and/or justice funding. Scored by influence type: lobbying (5×), donations (3×), contracts (2×), funding (1×), plus dollar thresholds.

#EntityVectorsContracts

Over-Monitored, Under-Funded

Community-controlled organisations appear in more government datasets than average (0 systems vs 0 overall) — but receive a fraction of the money. They are more visible to government, yet less resourced by it.

0
Community-Controlled Orgs
NaN% of all entities
0
Avg Datasets Appearing In
vs 0 overall average
0.0%
Of Procurement Dollars
$0B of $0B

The Geography of Power

Major cities receive vastly more dollar flow compared to Very Remote Australia. 0 of 0 LGAs score above 50 on our desert index — meaning high disadvantage, low funding, and sparse entity coverage.

Dollar Flow by Remoteness

Major Cities
$0B
Inner Regional
$12.91B
Outer Regional
$10.04B
Remote
$0.85B
Very Remote
$0B
#LGAEntitiesDesert Score

7 Datasets. One Map.

1
Procurement

$853.6B in AusTender contracts. Who wins government business.

2
Justice Funding

$33.9B in social program funding. Who gets state money.

3
Political Donations

AEC donation records. Who funds the politicians.

4
Charity Registry

66K ACNC charities. The formal nonprofit sector.

5
Foundations

10.8K grant-makers. Who controls philanthropy.

6
ALMA Evidence

1,155 interventions. What actually works.

7
ATO Tax

24K entities. Who pays tax on their income.

Each dataset is public. Each entity is matched by ABN. CivicGraph is the first platform to cross-reference all seven simultaneously — revealing who appears everywhere, who holds power across systems, and who gets watched but never funded.

Methodology

Entity resolution: Entities are matched across datasets using Australian Business Number (ABN). For justice funding records without ABNs, exact canonical name matching is used as a fallback. 88.6% of justice funding records are now linked to a resolved entity.

Power score: Composite score weighting system presence (3 points per system) plus dollar-weighted bonuses for procurement (>$1M/10M/100M), donations (>$10K/100K), and justice funding (>$1M/10M). Network breadth adds points for distinct government buyers (capped at 10) and political parties funded (capped at 8).

Revolving door score: Weighted by influence type — lobbying (5×), political donations (3×), contracts (2×), funding (1×). Additional points for high-dollar donations (>$100K) and large contracts (>$10M), plus the number of political parties funded (capped at 5).

Desert score: Composite of SEIFA IRSD decile (inverted, 0-100), remoteness category (0-40), entity coverage gap (0-30), and funding gap (0-20). Higher score means more disadvantaged, more remote, fewer entities, and less funding.

Community-controlled: Entities flagged as community-controlled in the entity registry. Includes Indigenous community organisations, community cooperatives, and locally governed service providers.

Limitations: ABN matching misses entities that operate under different ABNs across datasets. Political donations data has a reporting threshold. ATO tax transparency only covers entities above $100M income (or $200M for non-reporting). Board interlock data is limited to ACNC responsible persons for small charities — ASIC officeholder data would significantly expand this coverage.

Explore the Power Map

See these entities on the interactive force-directed graph. Filter by system count, explore connections, and trace power flows across Australia.

Full Report

Download: Cross-System Power Concentration

Get the complete report as a formatted PDF with all charts, tables, and data — ready to attach to board papers or share with colleagues.

Free for researchers, journalists, and community organisations. No spam, ever.

Cross-System Power Concentration | CivicGraph Investigation