Bestest Foundation
Board Interlocks (2 shared directors)
Giving Philosophy
Bestest Foundation values generosity and community support, selecting recipients based on need and potential for positive impact.
Tips for Applicants
Emphasize community support and potential for positive impact on disadvantaged children in NSW. Align proposals with the foundation's social welfare and youth-focused mission.
Financial History (7 years)
| Year | Revenue | Expenses | Assets | Surplus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $941K | $680K | $283K | $261K |
| 2022 | $146K | $270K | $27K | $-124,282 |
| 2021 | $211K | $285K | $145K | $-74,198 |
| 2020 | $411K | $381K | $142K | $30K |
| 2019 | $437K | $393K | $46K | $44K |
| 2018 | $210K | $309K | $15K | $-99,238 |
| 2017 | $258K | $260K | $86K | $-1,804 |
Community Evidence
External EvidenceIdentity
- GS ID
- AU-ABN-24702642597
- ABN
- 24702642597
- Sector
- community
- Website
- www.bestest.org.au
- Financial Year
- 2023
Focus Areas
Board & Leadership (3)
- board member
- chair
- public officer
Financials
- Revenue
- $941K
- Assets
- $283K
Method
- Match Confidence
- registry
- Cross-references
- 2 datasets
- Match Key
- ABN
- Relationships
- 8
Matched by Australian Business Number (ABN) — high confidence. This entity was found across multiple government datasets using the same ABN.
Data Sources
JusticeHub
External LinkThis entity is also tracked in JusticeHub with 0 interventions and 0 evidence records.
External ecosystem profile linked from GrantScope for additional context. JusticeHub content is maintained separately.
View on JusticeHubLocation Intelligence
- Postcode
- 2000
- Locality
- Sydney (North) - Millers Point
- Remoteness
- Major Cities of Australia
- SEIFA Disadvantage
- Decile 4/10
- LGA
- Sydney
- SA2 Region
- Sydney (North) - Millers Point
- Entities in Area
- 10,079
Disability Market Context
NDIS LayerThis organisation shows disability-related delivery signals. The strategic question is whether it sits inside a resilient market, a thin market, or a captured market where large providers take most of the money and local alternatives are scarce.