V.I.T.A.L. Projex
Concentration RiskAbout
V.I.T.A.L. Projex is a small registered charity based in Coalfalls, QLD. Its purposes include education, social welfare. It serves: first nations, adults, children, families, females, financially disadvantaged, general community, males, other charities, homelessness risk, disability, rural & remote, unemployed, victims of crime, youth.
Financial History (7 years)
| Year | Revenue | Expenses | Assets | Surplus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $1.1M | $770K | $775K | $291K |
| 2022 | $509K | $281K | $590K | $227K |
| 2021 | $261K | $182K | $208K | $79K |
| 2020 | $236K | $204K | $123K | $32K |
| 2019 | $162K | $177K | $71K | $-14,931 |
| 2018 | $181K | $151K | $86K | $30K |
| 2017 | $162K | $143K | $63K | $19K |
Community Evidence
External EvidenceIdentity
- GS ID
- AU-ABN-33156130648
- ABN
- 33156130648
- Sector
- Education
- Website
- www.vitalprojex.com
- Financial Year
- 2023
Focus Areas
Financials
- Revenue
- $1.1M
- Assets
- $775K
Method
- Match Confidence
- registry
- Cross-references
- 1 dataset
- Match Key
- ABN
- Relationships
- 11
Matched by Australian Business Number (ABN) — high confidence. This entity was found across multiple government datasets using the same ABN.
Data Sources
JusticeHub
External LinkThis entity is also tracked in JusticeHub with 1 intervention and 0 evidence records.
External ecosystem profile linked from GrantScope for additional context. JusticeHub content is maintained separately.
Location Intelligence
- Postcode
- 4305
- Locality
- Raceview
- Remoteness
- Major Cities of Australia
- SEIFA Disadvantage
- Decile 2/10
- LGA
- Scenic Rim
- SA2 Region
- Raceview
- Entities in Area
- 615
This entity is in a postcode ranked in the most disadvantaged 20% nationally (SEIFA Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage, ABS 2021 Census).
Disability Market Context
NDIS LayerThis organisation shows disability-related delivery signals. The strategic question is whether it sits inside a resilient market, a thin market, or a captured market where large providers take most of the money and local alternatives are scarce.