Dress for Success - Tasmania Inc.
About
Dress for Success - Tasmania Inc. is a medium registered charity based in Hobart, TAS. Its purposes include social welfare. It serves: first nations, adults, aged, ethnic groups, females, financially disadvantaged, homelessness risk, chronic illness, disability, pre/post release, rural & remote, unemployed, veterans, victims of crime, disaster victims, youth.
Financial History (6 years)
| Year | Revenue | Expenses | Assets | Surplus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $427K | $392K | $140K | $35K |
| 2022 | $225K | $281K | $137K | $-55,235 |
| 2021 | $266K | $208K | $139K | $58K |
| 2020 | $164K | $129K | $85K | $35K |
| 2019 | $548 | $4K | $8K | $-3,937 |
| 2018 | $31K | $19K | — | $12K |
Community Evidence
External EvidenceIdentity
- GS ID
- AU-ABN-61769200885
- ABN
- 61769200885
- Sector
- Social Welfare
- Website
- www.dressforsuccesstas.org
- Financial Year
- 2023
Focus Areas
Board & Leadership (9)
- board member
- board member
- board member
- chair
- director
- director
- director
- officeholder
- public officer
Financials
- Revenue
- $427K
- Assets
- $140K
Method
- Match Confidence
- registry
- Cross-references
- 1 dataset
- Match Key
- ABN
- Relationships
- 25
Matched by Australian Business Number (ABN) — high confidence. This entity was found across multiple government datasets using the same ABN.
Data Sources
JusticeHub
External LinkThis entity is also tracked in JusticeHub with 0 interventions and 0 evidence records.
External ecosystem profile linked from GrantScope for additional context. JusticeHub content is maintained separately.
View on JusticeHubLocation Intelligence
- Postcode
- 7000
- Locality
- BATHURST STREET PO
- Remoteness
- Inner Regional Australia
- SEIFA Disadvantage
- Decile 8/10
- LGA
- Hobart
- SA2 Region
- Hobart
- Entities in Area
- 773
Disability Market Context
NDIS LayerThis organisation shows disability-related delivery signals. The strategic question is whether it sits inside a resilient market, a thin market, or a captured market where large providers take most of the money and local alternatives are scarce.