THE CHIEF MINISTER'S CHARITABLE FUND LIMITED
Giving Philosophy
As a community foundation, Hands Across Canberra collects donations from individuals, families, and corporate entities in the ACT and redistributes them through grants to local charities supporting vulnerable Canberrans. They value long-term community investment, offering both immediate appeal giving and endowed named funds that provide ongoing annual distributions to causes donors care about.
Tips for Applicants
Given this is a community foundation that grants to other charities rather than directly to individuals, approach by highlighting how your charity serves vulnerable populations in the ACT. Emphasize alignment with their community-focused mission and demonstrate the local impact in Canberra. Consider establishing a named fund if seeking long-term partnership.
Financial History (1 years)
| Year | Revenue | Expenses | Assets | Surplus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $686K | $686K | $5.0M | — |
Community Evidence
External EvidenceIdentity
- GS ID
- AU-ABN-62627111700
- ABN
- 62627111700
- Sector
- indigenous
- Website
- handsacrosscanberra.org.au
- Financial Year
- 2019
Focus Areas
Board & Leadership (7)
- board member
- board member
- board member
- chair
- chair
- director
- officeholder
Financials
- Revenue
- $686K
- Assets
- $5.0M
Method
- Match Confidence
- registry
- Cross-references
- 2 datasets
- Match Key
- ABN
- Relationships
- 18
Matched by Australian Business Number (ABN) — high confidence. This entity was found across multiple government datasets using the same ABN.
Data Sources
JusticeHub
External LinkThis entity is also tracked in JusticeHub with 0 interventions and 0 evidence records.
External ecosystem profile linked from GrantScope for additional context. JusticeHub content is maintained separately.
View on JusticeHubDisability Market Context
NDIS LayerThis organisation shows disability-related delivery signals. The strategic question is whether it sits inside a resilient market, a thin market, or a captured market where large providers take most of the money and local alternatives are scarce.