Redcliffe and District Family History Group Incorporated
Concentration RiskAbout
Redcliffe and District Family History Group Incorporated is a small registered charity based in Woody Point, QLD. Its purposes include culture. It serves: first nations, adults, aged, ethnic groups, families, females, general community, males, migrants & refugees, disability, rural & remote.
Government Funding ($1K)
Financial History (7 years)
| Year | Revenue | Expenses | Assets | Surplus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | $7K | $7K | $56K | $292 |
| 2022 | $6K | $7K | $6K | $-289 |
| 2021 | $6K | $4K | $55K | $2K |
| 2020 | $3K | $4K | $52K | $-1,117 |
| 2019 | $4K | $7K | $5K | $-3,276 |
| 2018 | $9K | $8K | $54K | $2K |
| 2017 | $4K | $3K | $53K | $700 |
Community Evidence
External EvidenceIdentity
- GS ID
- AU-ABN-92598691311
- ABN
- 92598691311
- Sector
- Arts & Culture
- Website
- redcliffefamilyhistory.org/
- Financial Year
- 2023
Focus Areas
Board & Leadership (6)
- Cheryl Salisburyofficeholder
- Edmund Flackofficeholder
- Samuel Gillofficeholder
- Dianne Hendeyother
- Graham Protheroother
- Cheryl Salisburysecretary
Financials
- Revenue
- $7K
- Assets
- $56K
Method
- Match Confidence
- registry
- Cross-references
- 1 dataset
- Match Key
- ABN
- Relationships
- 8
Matched by Australian Business Number (ABN) — high confidence. This entity was found across multiple government datasets using the same ABN.
Data Sources
JusticeHub
External LinkThis entity is also tracked in JusticeHub with 0 interventions and 0 evidence records.
External ecosystem profile linked from GrantScope for additional context. JusticeHub content is maintained separately.
View on JusticeHubLocation Intelligence
This entity is in a postcode ranked in the most disadvantaged 30% nationally (SEIFA Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage, ABS 2021 Census).
Disability Market Context
NDIS LayerThis organisation shows disability-related delivery signals. The strategic question is whether it sits inside a resilient market, a thin market, or a captured market where large providers take most of the money and local alternatives are scarce.