← Community Funding Map

Blaxland - Warrimoo - Lapstone, NSW

2774Major Cities of AustraliaSEIFA Decile 9/10LGA: Blue MountainsView on Power MapDownload Place Brief (PDF)
Entities
110
Total Funding
$6.9M
Community-Controlled
0
CC Funding Share
0%

Top Funded Entities

$4.5M
C: $4.5M
$732K
C: $732K
$477K
C: $477K
$121K
C: $121K
$74K
C: $74K
$54K
C: $54K
$28K
C: $28K
$27K
C: $27K
P.Davies
Company
$27K
C: $27K
$10K
C: $10K

NDIS Supply & Service Pressure

State Providers
4,591
Thin Districts
2
Very Thin
1
Local Disability Delivery
0
91 disability-focused enterprises in NSW

NDIS money is not the same thing as healthy service coverage. This view shows whether Blaxland - Warrimoo - Lapstone, NSW sits inside a state market with thin provider supply, captured payment flows, and too few local disability-focused or community-controlled alternatives.

Thinnest Districts In NSW
Far West49 providers
Far West51 providers
Southern NSW242 providers
Southern NSW245 providers
Captured Markets
Far West95%
Mid North Coast89%
Western NSW75%
Murrumbidgee71%

Schools (7)

ACARA school profiles in postcode 2774. ICSEA measures educational advantage (national avg 1000).

Blaxland High School
GovernmentSecondary5% Indigenous
ICSEA 1065
998 students
Wycliffe Christian School
IndependentCombined2% Indigenous
ICSEA 1100
586 students
Blaxland East Public School
GovernmentPrimary9% Indigenous
ICSEA 1068
379 students
Mount Riverview Public School
GovernmentPrimary5% Indigenous
ICSEA 1050
231 students
Warrimoo Public School
GovernmentPrimary12% Indigenous
ICSEA 1052
146 students
Blaxland Public School
GovernmentPrimary8% Indigenous
ICSEA 1068
137 students
Wycliffe Hope School
IndependentSpecial3% Indigenous
ICSEA 1037
39 students

NDIS Participants

Blue Mountains (C) LGA
2,733
active participants
2025-Q4

All Entities (110)

Disadvantage Index

9/10
SEIFA IRSD Decile

This area has relatively low socio-economic disadvantage.

Entity Types

Company
72
Charity
35
Foundation
2
Govt
1

Gap Alert

This postcode has 110 funded entities but no identified community-controlled organisations receiving funding. This may indicate a gap in community self-determination.