← Community Funding Map

LAVERTON RAAF, VIC

3027Major Cities of AustraliaSEIFA Decile 9/10LGA: WyndhamView on Power MapDownload Place Brief (PDF)
Entities
104
Total Funding
Community-Controlled
0
CC Funding Share
0%

Top Funded Entities

NDIS Supply & Service Pressure

State Providers
3,026
Thin Districts
2
Very Thin
0
Local Disability Delivery
0
120 disability-focused enterprises in VIC

NDIS money is not the same thing as healthy service coverage. This view shows whether LAVERTON RAAF, VIC sits inside a state market with thin provider supply, captured payment flows, and too few local disability-focused or community-controlled alternatives.

Thinnest Districts In VIC
Mallee95 providers
Mallee98 providers
Outer Gippsland133 providers
Outer Gippsland145 providers
Captured Markets
Mallee88%
Western District87%
Outer Gippsland83%
Inner Gippsland75%

Crime & Safety — Wyndham LGA

Reported incidents by offence group (October 2024 - September 2025). Source: state crime statistics agencies.

Total
5573 per 100K
19,461
Theft
367 per 100K
9,743
Break and enter
138 per 100K
2,187
Assault
117 per 100K
1,830
Against justice procedures
133 per 100K
1,603
Property damage
199 per 100K
1,455
Fraud
19 per 100K
673
Other person offences
9 per 100K
543
Drug offences
1 per 100K
395
Weapons offences
23 per 100K
335

Social Need

DSS payment recipients in this area by payment type. Higher counts indicate service demand and community need.

Total Recipients
3,235
Payment Types
15
Pension Concession Card
570
Health Care Card
480
Family Tax Benefit A
455
Family Tax Benefit B
350
Commonwealth Rent Assistance
335
Age Pension
290
JobSeeker Payment
220
Carer Allowance
145
Disability Support Pension
90
Low Income Card
70

NDIS Participants

Wyndham (C) LGA
10,181
active participants
2025-Q4

All Entities (104)

Disadvantage Index

9/10
SEIFA IRSD Decile

This area has relatively low socio-economic disadvantage.

Entity Types

Company
94
Charity
8
person
1
Foundation
1

Gap Alert

This postcode has 104 funded entities but no identified community-controlled organisations receiving funding. This may indicate a gap in community self-determination.