← Community Funding Map
MONTMORENCY, VIC
3094Major Cities of AustraliaSEIFA Decile 10/10LGA: BanyuleView on Power MapDownload Place Brief (PDF)
Entities
50
Total Funding
$3.3M
Community-Controlled
0
CC Funding Share
0%
Top Funded Entities
$2.3M
G: $382K C: $1.9M
JENNIFER MASON
person
$440K
C: $440K
SPEEDEX TOOLING
Company
$347K
C: $347K
CHAMELEON TECHNOLOGY PTY LTD
Company
$115K
C: $115K
LEANNE MCGAIN - MIND THERAPY
Company
$60K
C: $60K
Quick As A Flush Plumbing
Company
$24K
C: $24K
ALICIA MARIE DIMOVSKI
Company
$20K
C: $20K
$15K
G: $15K
$11K
C: $11K
NDIS Supply & Service Pressure
State Providers
3,026
Thin Districts
2
Very Thin
0
Local Disability Delivery
0
120 disability-focused enterprises in VIC
NDIS money is not the same thing as healthy service coverage. This view shows whether MONTMORENCY, VIC sits inside a state market with thin provider supply, captured payment flows, and too few local disability-focused or community-controlled alternatives.
Thinnest Districts In VIC
Mallee95 providers
Mallee98 providers
Outer Gippsland133 providers
Outer Gippsland145 providers
Captured Markets
Mallee88%
Western District87%
Outer Gippsland83%
Inner Gippsland75%
Schools (4)
ACARA school profiles in postcode 3094. ICSEA measures educational advantage (national avg 1000).
Montmorency Secondary College
GovernmentSecondary1% Indigenous
ICSEA 1083
1,085 students
Montmorency South Primary School
GovernmentPrimary2% Indigenous
ICSEA 1112
620 students
Montmorency Primary School
GovernmentPrimary1% Indigenous
ICSEA 1117
415 students
St Francis Xavier Primary School
CatholicPrimary
ICSEA 1122
382 students
NDIS Participants
Banyule (C) LGA
3,908
active participants
2025-Q4
All Entities (50)
Charity
Charity
Company
Charity
Company
Company
Company
Company
Company
Company
Company
Company
Company
Company
+ 20 more entities
Disadvantage Index
10/10
SEIFA IRSD Decile
This area has relatively low socio-economic disadvantage.
Entity Types
- Company
- 34
- Charity
- 14
- person
- 1
- Foundation
- 1
Gap Alert
This postcode has 50 funded entities but no identified community-controlled organisations receiving funding. This may indicate a gap in community self-determination.