← Community Funding Map
HARROW, VIC
3317Outer Regional AustraliaSEIFA Decile 5/10LGA: Southern GrampiansView on Power MapDownload Place Brief (PDF)
Entities
8
Total Funding
—
Community-Controlled
0
CC Funding Share
0%
Top Funded Entities
NDIS Supply & Service Pressure
State Providers
3,026
Thin Districts
2
Very Thin
0
Local Disability Delivery
0
120 disability-focused enterprises in VIC
NDIS money is not the same thing as healthy service coverage. This view shows whether HARROW, VIC sits inside a state market with thin provider supply, captured payment flows, and too few local disability-focused or community-controlled alternatives.
Thinnest Districts In VIC
Mallee95 providers
Mallee98 providers
Outer Gippsland133 providers
Outer Gippsland145 providers
Captured Markets
Mallee88%
Western District87%
Outer Gippsland83%
Inner Gippsland75%
Crime & Safety — Southern Grampians LGA
Reported incidents by offence group (October 2024 - September 2025). Source: state crime statistics agencies.
Total
5648 per 100K
934
Against justice procedures
372 per 100K
190
Theft
73 per 100K
182
Assault
224 per 100K
145
Property damage
348 per 100K
128
Other person offences
22 per 100K
56
Drug offences
99 per 100K
50
Sexual Offences
266 per 100K
44
Fraud
254 per 100K
43
Disorderly conduct
24 per 100K
30
Social Need
DSS payment recipients in this area by payment type. Higher counts indicate service demand and community need.
Total Recipients
135
Payment Types
14
Pension Concession Card
30
Age Pension
20
Health Care Card
15
Family Tax Benefit B
10
JobSeeker Payment
10
Family Tax Benefit A
10
Commonwealth Seniors Health Card
5
Disability Support Pension
5
Low Income Card
5
Parenting Payment Single
5
NDIS Participants
Southern Grampians (S) LGA
540
active participants
2025-Q4
All Entities (8)
Company
Company
Disadvantage Index
5/10
SEIFA IRSD Decile
This area has moderate socio-economic disadvantage.
Entity Types
- Company
- 6
- Charity
- 2
Gap Alert
This postcode has 8 funded entities but no identified community-controlled organisations receiving funding. This may indicate a gap in community self-determination.