← Community Funding Map
CANNIE, VIC
3540Outer Regional AustraliaSEIFA Decile 1/10LGA: GannawarraView on Power MapDownload Place Brief (PDF)
Entities
12
Total Funding
—
Community-Controlled
0
CC Funding Share
0%
Top Funded Entities
NDIS Supply & Service Pressure
State Providers
3,026
Thin Districts
2
Very Thin
0
Local Disability Delivery
0
120 disability-focused enterprises in VIC
NDIS money is not the same thing as healthy service coverage. This view shows whether CANNIE, VIC sits inside a state market with thin provider supply, captured payment flows, and too few local disability-focused or community-controlled alternatives.
Thinnest Districts In VIC
Mallee95 providers
Mallee98 providers
Outer Gippsland133 providers
Outer Gippsland145 providers
Captured Markets
Mallee88%
Western District87%
Outer Gippsland83%
Inner Gippsland75%
Crime & Safety — Gannawarra LGA
Reported incidents by offence group (October 2024 - September 2025). Source: state crime statistics agencies.
Total
5821 per 100K
605
Against justice procedures
318 per 100K
148
Theft
279 per 100K
136
Assault
192 per 100K
79
Property damage
293 per 100K
65
Break and enter
192 per 100K
38
Drug offences
103 per 100K
37
Sexual Offences
308 per 100K
32
Other person offences
12 per 100K
30
Weapons offences
39 per 100K
16
Social Need
DSS payment recipients in this area by payment type. Higher counts indicate service demand and community need.
Total Recipients
270
Payment Types
15
Pension Concession Card
95
Age Pension
50
Disability Support Pension
25
Health Care Card
15
JobSeeker Payment
15
Carer Allowance
15
Family Tax Benefit A
10
Carer Payment
10
Family Tax Benefit B
5
Low Income Card
5
NDIS Participants
Gannawarra (S) LGA
264
active participants
2025-Q4
All Entities (12)
Company
Company
Company
Company
Company
Disadvantage Index
1/10
SEIFA IRSD Decile
This area is in the most disadvantaged 20% nationally. Community-controlled funding is critical here.
Entity Types
- Company
- 11
- Charity
- 1
Gap Alert
This postcode has 12 funded entities but no identified community-controlled organisations receiving funding. This may indicate a gap in community self-determination.