← Community Funding Map

SEYMOUR, VIC

3661Inner Regional AustraliaLGA: Latrobe (Vic.)View on Power MapDownload Place Brief (PDF)
Entities
6
Total Funding
$6K
Community-Controlled
0
CC Funding Share
0%

Top Funded Entities

NDIS Supply & Service Pressure

State Providers
3,026
Thin Districts
2
Very Thin
0
Local Disability Delivery
0
120 disability-focused enterprises in VIC

NDIS money is not the same thing as healthy service coverage. This view shows whether SEYMOUR, VIC sits inside a state market with thin provider supply, captured payment flows, and too few local disability-focused or community-controlled alternatives.

Thinnest Districts In VIC
Mallee95 providers
Mallee98 providers
Outer Gippsland133 providers
Outer Gippsland145 providers
Captured Markets
Mallee88%
Western District87%
Outer Gippsland83%
Inner Gippsland75%

Schools (1)

ACARA school profiles in postcode 3661. ICSEA measures educational advantage (national avg 1000).

Seymour College
GovernmentCombined9% Indigenous
ICSEA 933
730 students

Crime & Safety — Latrobe LGA

Reported incidents by offence group (October 2024 - September 2025). Source: state crime statistics agencies.

Total
12701 per 100K
10,090
Theft
413 per 100K
3,118
Against justice procedures
667 per 100K
2,063
Assault
290 per 100K
1,249
Property damage
634 per 100K
1,052
Break and enter
160 per 100K
825
Drug offences
7 per 100K
435
Other person offences
25 per 100K
319
Sexual Offences
368 per 100K
292
Weapons offences
79 per 100K
270

Social Need

DSS payment recipients in this area by payment type. Higher counts indicate service demand and community need.

Total Recipients
45
Payment Types
9
Family Tax Benefit B
5
Commonwealth Seniors Health Card
5
Commonwealth Rent Assistance
5
Age Pension
5
Disability Support Pension
5
Health Care Card
5
Pension Concession Card
5
JobSeeker Payment
5
Family Tax Benefit A
5

NDIS Participants

Latrobe (M) (Tas.) LGA
305
active participants
2025-Q4

All Entities (6)

Entity Types

Charity
5
Company
1

Gap Alert

This postcode has 6 funded entities but no identified community-controlled organisations receiving funding. This may indicate a gap in community self-determination.