← Community Funding Map
MAFFRA WEST UPPER, VIC
3859Outer Regional AustraliaSEIFA Decile 5/10LGA: WellingtonView on Power MapDownload Place Brief (PDF)
Entities
10
Total Funding
—
Community-Controlled
0
CC Funding Share
0%
Top Funded Entities
NDIS Supply & Service Pressure
State Providers
3,026
Thin Districts
2
Very Thin
0
Local Disability Delivery
0
120 disability-focused enterprises in VIC
NDIS money is not the same thing as healthy service coverage. This view shows whether MAFFRA WEST UPPER, VIC sits inside a state market with thin provider supply, captured payment flows, and too few local disability-focused or community-controlled alternatives.
Thinnest Districts In VIC
Mallee95 providers
Mallee98 providers
Outer Gippsland133 providers
Outer Gippsland145 providers
Captured Markets
Mallee88%
Western District87%
Outer Gippsland83%
Inner Gippsland75%
Crime & Safety — Wellington LGA
Reported incidents by offence group (October 2024 - September 2025). Source: state crime statistics agencies.
Total
8717 per 100K
4,088
Theft
192 per 100K
992
Against justice procedures
509 per 100K
853
Assault
279 per 100K
580
Property damage
449 per 100K
476
Break and enter
58 per 100K
386
Other person offences
24 per 100K
195
Sexual Offences
354 per 100K
166
Drug offences
22 per 100K
124
Weapons offences
98 per 100K
112
Social Need
DSS payment recipients in this area by payment type. Higher counts indicate service demand and community need.
Total Recipients
530
Payment Types
15
Pension Concession Card
160
Age Pension
105
Family Tax Benefit A
45
Health Care Card
45
Family Tax Benefit B
35
Disability Support Pension
25
Commonwealth Rent Assistance
25
JobSeeker Payment
20
Carer Allowance
20
Low Income Card
15
NDIS Participants
Wellington (S) LGA
1,625
active participants
2025-Q4
All Entities (10)
Foundation
Company
Company
Company
Company
Company
Company
Disadvantage Index
5/10
SEIFA IRSD Decile
This area has moderate socio-economic disadvantage.
Entity Types
- Company
- 9
- Foundation
- 1
Gap Alert
This postcode has 10 funded entities but no identified community-controlled organisations receiving funding. This may indicate a gap in community self-determination.