← Community Funding Map
FLINDERS NAVAL DEPOT, VIC
3920Major Cities of AustraliaSEIFA Decile 10/10LGA: Mornington PeninsulaView on Power MapDownload Place Brief (PDF)
Entities
6
Total Funding
$380K
Community-Controlled
0
CC Funding Share
0%
Top Funded Entities
$380K
C: $380K
NDIS Supply & Service Pressure
State Providers
3,026
Thin Districts
2
Very Thin
0
Local Disability Delivery
0
120 disability-focused enterprises in VIC
NDIS money is not the same thing as healthy service coverage. This view shows whether FLINDERS NAVAL DEPOT, VIC sits inside a state market with thin provider supply, captured payment flows, and too few local disability-focused or community-controlled alternatives.
Thinnest Districts In VIC
Mallee95 providers
Mallee98 providers
Outer Gippsland133 providers
Outer Gippsland145 providers
Captured Markets
Mallee88%
Western District87%
Outer Gippsland83%
Inner Gippsland75%
Crime & Safety — Mornington Peninsula LGA
Reported incidents by offence group (October 2024 - September 2025). Source: state crime statistics agencies.
Total
5459 per 100K
9,390
Theft
278 per 100K
3,564
Break and enter
112 per 100K
1,324
Against justice procedures
222 per 100K
1,228
Assault
102 per 100K
886
Property damage
218 per 100K
820
Fraud
30 per 100K
454
Drug offences
3 per 100K
296
Other person offences
10 per 100K
261
Sexual Offences
120 per 100K
206
Social Need
DSS payment recipients in this area by payment type. Higher counts indicate service demand and community need.
Total Recipients
55
Payment Types
9
Family Tax Benefit A
15
Carer Allowance
5
Commonwealth Rent Assistance
5
Disability Support Pension
5
Family Tax Benefit B
5
Youth Allowance (student and apprentice)
5
Pension Concession Card
5
JobSeeker Payment
5
Health Care Card
5
NDIS Participants
Mornington Peninsula (S) LGA
5,559
active participants
2025-Q4
All Entities (6)
Disadvantage Index
10/10
SEIFA IRSD Decile
This area has relatively low socio-economic disadvantage.
Entity Types
- Company
- 5
- Charity
- 1
Gap Alert
This postcode has 6 funded entities but no identified community-controlled organisations receiving funding. This may indicate a gap in community self-determination.