← Community Funding Map
KETTERING, TAS
7155Outer Regional AustraliaSEIFA Decile 7/10LGA: KingboroughView on Power MapDownload Place Brief (PDF)
Entities
24
Total Funding
$2.2M
Community-Controlled
0
CC Funding Share
0%
Top Funded Entities
ETM Perspectives Pty Ltd
Social Enterprise
$1.7M
C: $1.7M
EW CONSULTING PTY. LTD.
Company
$244K
C: $244K
Latitude 42 Environmental
Company
$187K
C: $187K
Anthony John Forman
Company
$14K
C: $14K
Green Marine
Company
$11K
C: $11K
Waters Edge Holdings Pty Ltd
Company
$9K
G: $9K
NDIS Supply & Service Pressure
State Providers
359
Thin Districts
0
Very Thin
0
Local Disability Delivery
0
12 disability-focused enterprises in TAS
NDIS money is not the same thing as healthy service coverage. This view shows whether KETTERING, TAS sits inside a state market with thin provider supply, captured payment flows, and too few local disability-focused or community-controlled alternatives.
Thinnest Districts In TAS
TAS North130 providers
TAS North West130 providers
TAS North West132 providers
TAS North133 providers
Captured Markets
TAS North West88%
TAS South West83%
TAS South East81%
TAS North75%
Social Need
DSS payment recipients in this area by payment type. Higher counts indicate service demand and community need.
Total Recipients
635
Payment Types
15
Pension Concession Card
195
Age Pension
130
Health Care Card
50
Commonwealth Seniors Health Card
40
Commonwealth Rent Assistance
35
Family Tax Benefit A
35
Disability Support Pension
30
JobSeeker Payment
30
Family Tax Benefit B
25
Carer Allowance
20
NDIS Participants
Kingborough (M) LGA
969
active participants
2025-Q4
All Entities (24)
Social Enterprise
Charity
Charity
Foundation
Company
Company
Company
Company
Company
Company
Company
Company
person
Company
Disadvantage Index
7/10
SEIFA IRSD Decile
This area has relatively low socio-economic disadvantage.
Entity Types
- Company
- 18
- Charity
- 3
- Social Enterprise
- 1
- Foundation
- 1
- person
- 1
Gap Alert
This postcode has 24 funded entities but no identified community-controlled organisations receiving funding. This may indicate a gap in community self-determination.