← Community Funding Map

George Town, TAS

7253Outer Regional AustraliaSEIFA Decile 1/10LGA: George TownView on Power MapDownload Place Brief (PDF)
Entities
56
Total Funding
$423K
Community-Controlled
0
CC Funding Share
0%

Top Funded Entities

$126K
G: $19K C: $107K
$50K
C: $50K
$15K
C: $15K

NDIS Supply & Service Pressure

State Providers
359
Thin Districts
0
Very Thin
0
Local Disability Delivery
0
12 disability-focused enterprises in TAS

NDIS money is not the same thing as healthy service coverage. This view shows whether George Town, TAS sits inside a state market with thin provider supply, captured payment flows, and too few local disability-focused or community-controlled alternatives.

Thinnest Districts In TAS
TAS North130 providers
TAS North West130 providers
TAS North West132 providers
TAS North133 providers
Captured Markets
TAS North West88%
TAS South West83%
TAS South East81%
TAS North75%

Schools (3)

ACARA school profiles in postcode 7253. ICSEA measures educational advantage (national avg 1000).

Port Dalrymple School
GovernmentCombined21% Indigenous
ICSEA 858
381 students
South George Town Primary School
GovernmentPrimary13% Indigenous
ICSEA 918
203 students
Star of the Sea Catholic College
CatholicCombined12% Indigenous
ICSEA 939
181 students

Social Need

DSS payment recipients in this area by payment type. Higher counts indicate service demand and community need.

Total Recipients
6,805
Payment Types
15
Pension Concession Card
2,090
Age Pension
1,035
Commonwealth Rent Assistance
590
Health Care Card
490
Disability Support Pension
480
Family Tax Benefit A
430
JobSeeker Payment
415
Family Tax Benefit B
365
Carer Allowance
320
Carer Payment
185

NDIS Participants

George Town (M) LGA
270
active participants
2025-Q4

All Entities (56)

Disadvantage Index

1/10
SEIFA IRSD Decile

This area is in the most disadvantaged 20% nationally. Community-controlled funding is critical here.

Entity Types

Company
42
Charity
14

Gap Alert

This postcode has 56 funded entities but no identified community-controlled organisations receiving funding. This may indicate a gap in community self-determination.