← Community Funding Map

Longford, TAS

7301Inner Regional AustraliaSEIFA Decile 3/10LGA: Meander ValleyView on Power MapAlignment 42/100Download Place Brief (PDF)
Entities
48
Total Funding
$470K
Community-Controlled
0
CC Funding Share
0%

Top Funded Entities

$424K
C: $424K
$46K
C: $46K

Evidence-Funding Alignment

42/100
Weak
1 evidence-based interventions (1 funded).
Interventions
1
Funded
1
Voice Records
0
PCYC General Programs
Community-Led · Untested (theory/pilot stage)
Funded

NDIS Supply & Service Pressure

State Providers
359
Thin Districts
0
Very Thin
0
Local Disability Delivery
0
12 disability-focused enterprises in TAS

NDIS money is not the same thing as healthy service coverage. This view shows whether Longford, TAS sits inside a state market with thin provider supply, captured payment flows, and too few local disability-focused or community-controlled alternatives.

Thinnest Districts In TAS
TAS North130 providers
TAS North West130 providers
TAS North West132 providers
TAS North133 providers
Captured Markets
TAS North West88%
TAS South West83%
TAS South East81%
TAS North75%

Schools (1)

ACARA school profiles in postcode 7301. ICSEA measures educational advantage (national avg 1000).

Longford Primary School
GovernmentPrimary17% Indigenous
ICSEA 921
230 students

Social Need

DSS payment recipients in this area by payment type. Higher counts indicate service demand and community need.

Total Recipients
4,295
Payment Types
15
Pension Concession Card
1,335
Age Pension
825
Commonwealth Rent Assistance
365
Family Tax Benefit A
330
Health Care Card
260
Family Tax Benefit B
255
Disability Support Pension
220
JobSeeker Payment
180
Carer Allowance
150
Commonwealth Seniors Health Card
100

NDIS Participants

Meander Valley (M) LGA
555
active participants
2025-Q4

All Entities (48)

Disadvantage Index

3/10
SEIFA IRSD Decile

This area has moderate socio-economic disadvantage.

Entity Types

Company
32
Charity
12
Foundation
2
Govt
2

Gap Alert

This postcode has 48 funded entities but no identified community-controlled organisations receiving funding. This may indicate a gap in community self-determination.