← Community Funding Map

FLINDERS LANE, VIC

Entities
13
Total Funding
$44.1M
Community-Controlled
0
CC Funding Share
0%
1 social & Indigenous enterprisesoperating in this area
Browse →

Top Funded Entities

$41.1M
G: $5.0M C: $36.1M
$1.9M
G: $1.9M
$785K
G: $691K C: $94K
$86K
G: $86K

NDIS Supply & Service Pressure

State Providers
3,026
Thin Districts
2
Very Thin
0
Local Disability Delivery
0
120 disability-focused enterprises in VIC

NDIS money is not the same thing as healthy service coverage. This view shows whether FLINDERS LANE, VIC sits inside a state market with thin provider supply, captured payment flows, and too few local disability-focused or community-controlled alternatives.

Thinnest Districts In VIC
Mallee95 providers
Mallee98 providers
Outer Gippsland133 providers
Outer Gippsland145 providers
Captured Markets
Mallee88%
Western District87%
Outer Gippsland83%
Inner Gippsland75%

Social & Indigenous Enterprises (1)

Bush Heritage Australia
acnc-classifiedABN 78053639115

Land conservation and management services, eco-tourism, environmental consulting, funded through mixed commercial activities and donations

environmentindigenous
Browse all in VIC →

Crime & Safety — Melbourne LGA

Reported incidents by offence group (October 2024 - September 2025). Source: state crime statistics agencies.

Total
17818 per 100K
34,671
Theft
785 per 100K
17,027
Assault
171 per 100K
3,568
Property damage
618 per 100K
2,873
Against justice procedures
145 per 100K
2,719
Break and enter
59 per 100K
2,480
Fraud
31 per 100K
1,537
Drug offences
2 per 100K
1,233
Weapons offences
46 per 100K
809
Disorderly conduct
15 per 100K
796

Social Need

DSS payment recipients in this area by payment type. Higher counts indicate service demand and community need.

Total Recipients
10
Payment Types
2
Health Care Card
5
JobSeeker Payment
5

NDIS Participants

Melbourne (C) LGA
1,928
active participants
2025-Q4

All Entities (13)

Entity Types

Charity
11
Foundation
1
Company
1

Gap Alert

This postcode has 13 funded entities but no identified community-controlled organisations receiving funding. This may indicate a gap in community self-determination.