← Community Funding Map

ERINDALE, SA

5066Major Cities of AustraliaSEIFA Decile 10/10LGA: Adelaide HillsView on Power MapDownload Place Brief (PDF)
Entities
105
Total Funding
$19.9M
Community-Controlled
0
CC Funding Share
0%

Top Funded Entities

$2.3M
C: $2.3M
$2.2M
C: $2.2M
$1.7M
C: $1.7M
$1.3M
C: $1.3M
$1.3M
C: $1.3M
$763K
G: $236K C: $527K
$622K
C: $622K
$411K
C: $411K
$315K
C: $315K
$243K
C: $243K
$236K
C: $236K
$198K
C: $198K
$190K
C: $190K
$174K
C: $174K
$78K
C: $78K

Justice Funding ($8K)

Gurjari SA Inc
Navratri Garba · community services
$3K
Gurjari SA Inc
Navratri Garba · community services
$2K
Gurjari SA Inc
Diwali Celebrations · community services
$2K

NDIS Supply & Service Pressure

State Providers
958
Thin Districts
8
Very Thin
1
Local Disability Delivery
0
21 disability-focused enterprises in SA

NDIS money is not the same thing as healthy service coverage. This view shows whether ERINDALE, SA sits inside a state market with thin provider supply, captured payment flows, and too few local disability-focused or community-controlled alternatives. This matters here because ERINDALE, SA already shows $8K in justice-related funding moving through local entities.

Thinnest Districts In SA
Far North (SA)49 providers
Far North (SA)50 providers
Eyre and Western62 providers
Eyre and Western67 providers
Captured Markets
Barossa, Light and Lower North97%
Far North (SA)97%
Fleurieu and Kangaroo Island92%
Limestone Coast91%

Schools (2)

ACARA school profiles in postcode 5066. ICSEA measures educational advantage (national avg 1000).

St Peter's Collegiate Girls' School
IndependentCombined
ICSEA 1180
873 students
Burnside Primary School
GovernmentPrimary1% Indigenous
ICSEA 1156
686 students

NDIS Participants

Adelaide Hills (DC) LGA
1,035
active participants
2025-Q4

All Entities (105)

Disadvantage Index

10/10
SEIFA IRSD Decile

This area has relatively low socio-economic disadvantage.

Entity Types

Company
86
Charity
10
Foundation
8
Govt
1

Gap Alert

This postcode has 105 funded entities but no identified community-controlled organisations receiving funding. This may indicate a gap in community self-determination.